The parents stated in depositions that they only learned about CS:GO skin gambling after the fact, so Valve failing to disclose the odds of CS:GO weapon cases wouldn't have changed anything about the case. Valve countered that loot boxes aren't considered gambling, but the judge in the case dismissed the case on different grounds. Unsuccessful in the illegal gambling charge, parents finally attempted to sue Valve under Washington's Consumer Protection Act, alleging that CS:GO weapon cases are essentially loot boxes that fail to disclose the odds with each purchase. Many cases were forced into arbitration as part of Steam's user agreement, where arbitrators found that plaintiffs couldn't prove Valve operated or facilitated any of these third-party gambling sites. However, as reported by PC Gamer, the lawsuits against Valve have been steadily reduced in the years since.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |